0
liters/batch
Media Manufacturing Capacity
0
liters/batch
Resins Manufacturing Capacity
Online Service
Tel.:
(0575) 8070 9355
Mail:
support@yskbio.com
service qrcode
技术专家
Related
Ni ResinsNi Resins
  • Ni Resins
  • Ni Resins
  • 1/2
  • Ni Resins
  • Ni Resins

Ni Resins

Aplo Ni Sepharose FF is an affinity chromatography medium designed for the purification of histidine-tagged proteins, pre-packed with nickel ions firmly bound to a chelating ligand. When chelating agents are present in the sample, the medium minimizes nickel ion leaching while maximizing protein recovery. It is suitable for purifying proteins expressed in eukaryotic cells like insect-baculovirus, 293 cells, and CHO cells, as well as in bacteria such as E. coli. The medium allows direct loading of samples without pre-treatment, preventing nickel leaching.

Ni Sepharose FF affinity chromatography media are designed by chelating divalent nickel ions (Ni(2+)) onto an agarose gel matrix with aminotriacetic acid as the ligand. These media offer several advantages, including high adsorption capacity, good selectivity, ease of regeneration, and low cost. They are widely used for the separation and purification of proteins and peptides, particularly for purifying histidine-ta
Brand Series Aplo
Product Type Prepacked columns, Resins
Pack Size 1mL 5mL 10mL 25mL 100mL 500mL 1L 5L 10L
Apply For Free Trial
DetailOrder InformationDocuments

Product

Aplo Ni Singarose FF

Ni Singarose FF

Features

Resistant to chelating agents and reducing agents

High adsorption capacity, good selectivity, and easy to regenerate

Application

Suitable for purifying proteins expressed in eukaryotic cells like insect-baculovirus, 293 cells, and CHO cells, as well as in bacteria such as E. coli

Purification of histidine-tagged proteins

Matrix

6% highly cross-linked agarose

Particle size

90 μm

90 μm

Functional group

Ni2+

Ligand concentration

50-90 μmol Ni2+/mL resin

20-25 μmol Ni2+/mL resin

Capacity

10mg His-tagged protein/mL resin

40mg His-tagged protein/mL resin

Flow velocity

<250 cm/h

<250 cm/h

Max. pressure

<0.3 MPa

pH stability

3-12(operational), 2-14(CIP,short term,when removing metal ions)

Chemical stability

0.01M HCl, 0.01M NaOH(one week);10mM EDTA, 5mM DTT, 1M NaOH, 5mM TCEP, 20mM β-mercaptoethanol, 6M guanidine hydrochloride(24H); 500mM imidazole, 100mM EDTA(2H); 30% isopropanol(20 minutes)

40℃ for1 week:0.01M HCl, 0.1M NaOH, 8M urea, 6M guanidine hydrochloride;

12h:1M NaOH, 70% Acetic acid;

1h: 2% SDS; 30min: 30% Isopropyl alcohol

Storage conditions

20% ethanol; 4-30℃




Pack size

Cat. No.

Aplo Ni Singarose FF

Ni Singarose FF

1ml XTrap Prepacked columns

HC1060111

HC1020111

5ml XTrap Prepacked columns

HC1060112

HC1020112

5ml XScreen Prepacked columns

HC1060113

HC1020113

10ml

HC1060100

HC1020100

25ml

HC1060101

HC1020101

100ml

HC1060102

HC1020102

500ml

HC1060103

HC1020103

1L

HC1060104

HC1020104

5L

HC1060105

HC1020105

10L

HC1060106

HC1020106


Operating Instructions

1. Column Packing

1.1 Packing Buffer Preparation

Purified water; degas byultrasonication for 15 min.

1.2 Resin Preparation

Calculate the required amount ofresin using a compression factor of approximately 1.15, and weigh out theresin. Exchange the storage solution for packing buffer using a vacuumfiltration flask. Add sufficient packing buffer to prepare a resin slurry ofapproximately 50%.

1.3 Column Preparation

Inspect the chromatography column toensure that all components are intact and clean. Install the bottom adaptor andtighten the O-ring. Secure the column vertically on a laboratory stand; checkand adjust its alignment with a spirit level. Fill a syringe with packingbuffer, connect it to the bottom outlet, and slowly expel the buffer to removeair bubbles from the bottom screen. Remove the syringe and install the bottomplug. Add packing buffer to a height of approximately 2 cm in the column.

1.4 Column Packing (example: 16 mm column diameter, 10 cm bedheight)

Mix the resin slurry thoroughly and pour it slowly into the columnalong a glass rod. If the liquid level remains below the top of the column, addpacking buffer to fill the column. Connect the adaptor to the chromatographysystem, start the pump, and remove air from the tubing and top screen at anappropriate flow rate; then pause the system. Insert the adaptor into thecolumn at a 45° angle, secure it, and tighten the sealing ring while preventingair from entering. Remove the bottom plug and direct the bottom tubing into awaste container. Pack at 60 cm/h until the resin-bed interface stabilizes.Increase the linear velocity to 600 cm/h, then gradually reduce it to 300 cm/hand maintain the final rate for 45 min. Mark the resin-bed interface and stopthe system. Reinstall the bottom plug and disconnect the top of the column fromthe pump. Loosen the adaptor sealing ring slightly, lower the adaptor to 3 mmbelow the resin surface, and retighten the seal. Connect the top and bottomcolumn tubing to the chromatography system and perform a column-efficiencytest.

2. Column Efficiency Test

Test column efficiency immediatelyafter packing. Column performance is typically assessed using the number oftheoretical plates per meter (N/m) and the peak asymmetry factor (As). Highercolumn efficiency indicates greater separation capability. For a more accurateassessment, use a test-sample volume of 1.0% of the column volume and a linearvelocity of 15-30 cm/h. Inject the sample as close to the column inlet aspossible to minimize dilution.

Table 2. Column EfficiencyTest Methods

Item

Contents

Test Method

Acetone Method

NaCl Method

Sample

1.0% (v/v) acetone in water

0.8 M NaCl solution

Sample Volume

1.0%CV*

1.0%CV*

Mobile Phase

Water

0.4 M NaCl solution

Flow Rate

30 cm/h

30 cm/h

Detection

UV 280

Conductivity

Note*: CV (Column Volume) refers tocolumn volume and is abbreviated as CV below.

Column Efficiency Calculation

Calculate N/m and As from the UVcurve (or conductivity curve) using the following equations:

N/m = N/L

N = 5.54(VR/Wh)2

As=b/a

Note: In the equations, VR is theretention volume; Wh is the peak width at half height; L is the bed height inmeters; and N is the number of theoretical plates. VR and Wh must use the sameunits. In Figure 1, a is the leading half-width of the peak at 10% peak height,and b is the trailing half-width at 10% peak height.

Figure 1. SchematicDiagram for Column Efficiency Calculation

Column efficiency test chromatogram showing retention volume and peak widths

The peak should be symmetrical, withan asymmetry factor (As) as close to 1.0 as possible; values between 0.8 and1.8 are generally acceptable. N/m > 3,000.

3. Separation andPurification

Phosphate buffer atneutral to mildly alkaline pH (pH 6.0-8.0) is preferred. Avoid EDTA, citrate,and similar reagents. Tris-HCl can also be used but should be avoided whenmetal-protein affinity is very weak. Tables 3 and 4 list common additives andconcentrations for Aplo Ni Singarose FF affinity resin.[TR1]

Toreduce nonspecific binding of host-cell proteins, add an appropriateconcentration of imidazole to the binding buffer and sample as required by theapplication. The buffer must contain 0.5-1.0 M NaCl to suppress ionicinteractions.

Table 3. Additives that do not interfere with protein binding toAplo Ni Singarose FF

Additive

Typical Concentration

Additive

Typical Concentration

Phosphate, Tris, borate, and HEPES

20-100 mM

Nonionic detergent

≤2%

NaCl

≤2 M

Triton X-100

≤2%

KCl

≤1 M

Tween-20

≤2%

guanidine hydrochloride

≤6 M

Octyl glucoside

≤2%

urea

≤8 M

Dodecyl maltoside

≤2%

Glycerol

≤50%

C12E8、C10E6

≤2%

isopropanol

≤60%

PMSF (protease inhibitor)

1 mM

ethanol

≤30%

Pepsin inhibitor[TR2]

1 μM

Zwitterionic detergent (CHAPS)

≤1%

Leupeptin (protease inhibitor)

0.5 μg/mL

1% benzamidine (protease inhibitor)

≤1 mM

/

/

Table 4. Additives that may disrupt protein binding to Aplo NiSingarose FF (avoid whenever possible)

Additive

Typical Concentration

Additive

Typical Concentration

β-mercaptoethanol

<20 mM

Citrate

Low concentrations tolerated

reduced glutathione

<10 mM

Histidine

Can replace imidazole

Strong reducing agents (DTT, TCEP, DTE)*

<20 mM*

glycine

—

Metal chelators (EDTA, EGTA)**

<100 mM**

glutamine

—

Ionic detergents (cholate, SDS)

—

Arginine

—

Sodium azide

3 mM

NH4Cl

—

Note*:Avoid strong reducing agents whenever possible to prevent reduction of Ni2+and consequent impairment of protein binding. The maximum toleratedconcentration depends on the sample. Reducing agents may be present only in thesample, not in the buffer.

Note**:Avoid metal-ion chelators whenever possible to prevent Ni2+ frombeing stripped from the resin. The maximum tolerated concentration depends onthe sample. Chelators may be present only in the sample, not in the buffer.

3.1 Column Equilibration

Connectthe chromatography column to the purification system. Equilibrate the columnwith at least 5 CV of binding buffer until the pH and conductivity of thecolumn effluent match those of the binding buffer. After equilibration, zerothe UV detector.

Note:To minimize the effect of Ni2+ leakage on chromatographyperformance, wash the column before equilibration with 1 CV of 0.5 M imidazolecontaining 1 M NaCl, followed by 5 CV of purified water. Equilibrate the columnwith binding buffer before sample loading.

Note:Recommended binding buffer: 20 mM phosphate buffer, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.4. Filterthrough a 0.2 μm membrane.

Note:When purifying inclusion bodies, add 8 M urea or 6 M guanidine hydrochloride toboth the binding buffer and the sample.

3.2 Sample Loading

Loadthe sample, filtered through a 0.2 or 0.45 μm membrane, onto the chromatographycolumn. The sample volume depends on the resin binding capacity, theconcentration of resin-binding molecules in the sample, and the otherchromatography conditions.

3.3 Column Washing

Washthe column with 5-10 CV of binding buffer to remove impurities that do not bindunder these conditions, until the UV signal returns close to baseline.Alternatively, use the impurity-washing conditions established duringpreliminary experiments.

3.4 Elution

Flushthe column with elution buffer and begin collecting eluate when the target UVpeak begins to rise.

Note:Recommended elution buffer: 20 mM phosphate buffer, 500 mM NaCl, 500 mMimidazole, pH 7.4. Filter through a 0.2 μm membrane.

Note:Select competitive elution, elution by lowering the pH, or chelator-mediatedelution as appropriate for the application.

Competitiveelution: Increase the concentration of a substance with affinity for Ni2+,such as 0-2 M NH4Cl, 0-0.5 M imidazole, or 0-0.5 M histidine, using a linear orstepwise gradient. Perform gradient elution at a constant binding-buffer pH.

Elutionby lowering pH: As pH decreases, weakly bound proteins elute before stronglybound proteins.

3.5 Cleaning and Storage

Washwith 3-5 CV of 0.5 M imidazole containing 1 M NaCl, followed by purified wateruntil the conductivity of the column effluent reaches 0. Then wash with 2-3 CVof 20% ethanol. Store the column at 4-30°C.

Note:Resin reusability depends on the sample. Use a separate resin preparation foreach sample type to prevent cross-contamination.

4. Regeneration

Columnsused repeatedly can be cleaned directly with NaOH without stripping nickel.

5. Cleaning in Place

Cleaning in place (CIP) removesstrongly bound, precipitated, or denatured material from the resin. Residualimpurities can impair column performance; substantial accumulation can clog thecolumn, increase backpressure, and reduce flow rate. Regular CIP preventscontaminants from accumulating in the bed and helps maintain resin bindingcapacity and flow properties.

Clean the column after approximately3-5 cycles to restore resin performance. Recommended cleaning conditions fordifferent impurities and contaminants are provided below:

5.1 To remove proteins bound byionic interactions, wash the column with 2-3 CV of 2 M NaCl, followed bybinding buffer.

5.2 To remove precipitated proteinsand hydrophobically bound material, first strip the Ni2+ ions, thensoak the column in 0.2-1 M NaOH for at least 1 h.

5.3 To remove strongly boundhydrophobic proteins, lipids, and similar material, wash the column with 3-5 CVof 70% ethanol or 30% isopropanol for 15-20 min, then equilibrate with bindingbuffer.

Alternatively, soaking overnight in6 M guanidine hydrochloride can remove most contaminating proteins. If thecolumn will be used immediately after cleaning, wash with 3-10 CV of bindingbuffer.

6. Sanitization

Sanitization minimizes microbialcontamination of the chromatography column. Because 20% ethanol is neitherbactericidal nor depyrogenating, treat Aplo Ni Singarose FF ChromatographyResin with 70% ethanol for 12 h, or soak it in 0.5-1 M NaOH for 0.5-1 h.

7. Storage

Store unused resin at 4-30°C in adry, well-ventilated, clean area. Keep the container tightly closed. Do notfreeze.

Store columns packed with Aplo NiSingarose FF sealed and immersed in 20% ethanol or 2% benzyl alcohol to preventmicrobial contamination.

Replace the storage solution withfresh solution every 3 months to prevent microbial growth resulting fromethanol evaporation.

Note: Before using stored resin,perform CIP and equilibrate with at least 5 CV of binding buffer.

8. Linear Scale-up

A purification process optimized atlaboratory scale can be scaled linearly to pilot or production scale. Considerthe following during scale-up:

Keep the residence time constant tomaintain stable dynamic binding capacity.

Select the column volume based onthe required binding capacity. If the bed height changes, assess the effect onthe purification step.

Determine the column diameter fromthe required flow rate and the bed height from the established residence time.A bed height of 10-25 cm is generally recommended.

Ensure uniform sample concentrationand consistent elution conditions.


Troubleshooting

Table 5. TroubleshootingRecommendations

Issue

Possible Cause and   Recommended Solution

Excessive pressure during use

Replace the inline filter.

The chromatography column is  clogged; perform CIP cleaning.

Unstable pressure curve

Remove air bubbles from the sample  loading pump.

Use a bubble trap to remove air  bubbles from the sample.

Protein does not bind or binding  capacity is low

Sonication denatures the protein:  use milder sonication conditions during lysis.

Protein binding is weak: select a  resin with higher binding capacity.

The tag is buried within the  protein: optimize expression conditions or redesign the sequence.

Protein aggregates during loading:  add a nonionic detergent to the sample and buffer.

Equilibration pH is unsuitable:  adjust buffer pH to 6.5-8.0.

The resin is no longer effective:  replace it with fresh resin.

Sample load exceeds capacity:  reduce the sample load.

Protein or lipid accumulation  impairs binding: clean promptly or replace the resin.

Loading flow rate is too high:  reduce the loading flow rate.

Poor elution performance

No product is collected, or binding  is low: confirm that the tagged protein binds to the resin.

Elution flow rate is too high:  reduce it.

Elution-buffer volume is  insufficient: increase it.

Imidazole concentration is too low:  try increasing it.

Elution contact time is  insufficient: reduce the flow rate to increase contact between the elution  buffer and resin.

Impurity-washing conditions are  unsuitable: optimize imidazole and NaCl concentrations to improve purity and  recovery.

Impurities have high affinity for  Ni2+: combine this step with another resin type.

Elution buffer is ineffective:  prepare fresh elution buffer.

Nonspecific ionic binding: add  0.1-0.2 M NaCl to the elution buffer.

Nonspecific hydrophobic binding:  add 0.1% Triton X-100 to the elution buffer.

Aggregation or precipitation occurs  during elution: establish protein solubility and stability under the elution  conditions.

Resin discoloration

The sample contains pigments or  colored proteins: perform CIP or regeneration strictly after purification.

Reducing agents in the sample or  buffer turn the resin brown: avoid or reduce their use.

Elution peak gradually broadens

The chromatography column may be  contaminated. Optimize the elution conditions and perform CIP as specified.

Increased CIP peak

CIP strength is insufficient;  optimize the CIP conditions.

Ligand leakage may be higher during  initial use.

Before initial use, run one blank  cycle and perform CIP.